On July 16, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Stammco, L.L.C., v. United Tel. Co. of Ohio, 2013-Ohio-3019. By a vote of 5-2 in an opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the Court held that the trial court was correct in refusing to allow this case to proceed as a
Civ. R. 23
What’s On their Minds: Evaluating the Merits of Plaintiffs’ Claims When Denying Class Certification. Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio, d.b.a. United Telephone Co., et al.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update:On July 16, 2013 the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
On February 6, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio, d.b.a. United Telephone Co., et al., 2012-0169.…
Oral Argument Preview: Evaluating the Merits of Plaintiffs’ Claims When Denying Class Certification. Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio, d.b.a. United Telephone Co., et al.
By Marianna Bettman on
Update:On July 16, 2013 the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.
Read the analysis of the oral argment here.
On February 6, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone…
In Sharper Focus: A Class Action Primer.
By Marianna Bettman on
On February 6, 2013, and then again on February 26, the Supreme Court of Ohio is going to hear two cases involving significant class action issues. To that end, blog student contributor Greg Kendall (now a 3L at the University of Cincinnati College of Law,) has prepared this post on some class action fundamentals. Also,…