“Here, there is simply no textual basis to support requiring a trial court to make explicit findings on the record regarding the defendant’s ability to pay before assessing court-appointed-counsel fees.”

Justice Fischer, lead opinion

“Nothing in the Revised Code explicitly grants trial courts the authority to assess appointed-counsel fees as part of a criminal case.”

“Here, there is simply no textual basis to support requiring a trial court to make explicit findings on the record regarding the defendant’s ability to pay before assessing court-appointed-counsel fees.”

Justice Fischer, lead opinion

“Nothing in the Revised Code explicitly grants trial courts the authority to assess appointed-counsel fees as part of a criminal case.”

Update: On December 22, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Update: On May 26, 2020, the Court issued this order requesting supplemental briefing in this case:

Sua sponte, parties ordered to file supplemental briefs addressing the following issues: (1) whether R.C. 2941.51(D) authorizes

Update: Read about the disposition of this case here

“So are you suggesting that we should interpret the statute to indicate that the trial court must always hold a hearing on the ability to pay costs, or only if it’s requested or depends on the facts of the case?”

Justice DeGenaro, to counsel for the