What’s On Their Minds: Is the Temporary Restraining Order in this Case a Prior Restraint on Speech Subject to Immediate Appellate Review? M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer pleading under a pseudonym v. Julie Niesen and Terhas White and James Noe and Alissa Gilley.
By Marianna Bettman on
Posted in Ohio Supreme Court Watch
Update: On April 6, 2022, this appeal was unanimously dismissed as moot.
“At the time that the trial court said it (the T.R.O.) is to remain in effect, had it already expired?”
Justice Brunner, to counsel for White
“In your view what is in front of us?”
Justice Fischer, to counsel for M.R.
On November…
What’s On Their Minds: Can Law Enforcement Search a Backpack Found in Plain View in a Residence Without a Warrant? State of Ohio v. Kennedy M. Burroughs
“Here the container may not have announced its contents by the shape of the container, but didn’t it announce its contents by what was sticking out of the container?”
Justice DeWine to counsel for Burroughs
“In your view what was the single purpose of the backpack?”
Justice Fischer, to the prosecuting attorney
On October 27…
What’s On Their Minds: Was Warrantless, Suspicionless Search of Probationer’s Cell Phone Improper? State of Ohio v. Daniel J. Campbell
“Shouldn’t there be a nexus between what the person is on probation for and why they would search?”
Justice Donnelly, to the assistant county prosecutor
“So, what do we do about the fact there’s no remedy spelled out in the statute?”
Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for the defendant
On October 26, 2021, the Supreme…
What’s On Their Minds: Was Warrantless, Suspicionless Search of Probationer’s Cell Phone Improper? State of Ohio v. Daniel J. Campbell
“Shouldn’t there be a nexus between what the person is on probation for and why they would search?”
Justice Donnelly, to the assistant county prosecutor
“So, what do we do about the fact there’s no remedy spelled out in the statute?”
Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for the defendant
On October 26, 2021, the Supreme…
Oral Argument Preview: Does a Relative have Standing to Pursue Companionship with a Deceased Parent’s Children Following an Intra-Family Adoption? Rachel Davis v. Tammie Nathaniel.
By Marianna Bettman on
On March 16, 2022, in a 6-1 vote, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed this case for lack of a final, appealable order. Justice Brunner dissented.
On November 10, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Rachel Davis v. Tammie Nathaniel, et al., 2021- 0170. At…
Oral Argument Preview: Does a Relative have Standing to Pursue Companionship with a Deceased Parent’s Children Following an Intra-Family Adoption? Rachel Davis v. Tammie Nathaniel.
By Marianna Bettman on
On March 16, 2022, in a 6-1 vote, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed this case for lack of a final, appealable order. Justice Brunner dissented.
On November 10, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Rachel Davis v. Tammie Nathaniel, et al., 2021- 0170. At…
Oral Argument Preview: Is the Temporary Restraining Order in this Case a Prior Restraint on Speech Subject to Immediate Appellate Review? M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer pleading under a pseudonym v. Julie Niesen and Terhas White and James Noe and Alissa Gilley.
Update: On April 6, 2022, this appeal was unanimously dismissed as moot.
On November 9, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer pleading under a pseudonym v. Julie Niesen and Terhas White and James Noe and Alissa Gilley, 2020- 1131. At issue in this…
Oral Argument Preview: Is the Temporary Restraining Order in this Case a Prior Restraint on Speech Subject to Immediate Appellate Review? M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer pleading under a pseudonym v. Julie Niesen and Terhas White and James Noe and Alissa Gilley.
Update: On April 6, 2022, this appeal was unanimously dismissed as moot.
On November 9, 2021, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in M.R., a Cincinnati Police Officer pleading under a pseudonym v. Julie Niesen and Terhas White and James Noe and Alissa Gilley, 2020- 1131. At issue in this…
What’s On Their Minds : Is a Mistaken Belief that a Child is not Living with an Accused Abusive Parent Sufficient to Preserve Child Protection Caseworker Immunity? Tammy Smathers, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Harmony Brooklyn Rayne Carsey v. Rick Glass, Executive Director of Perry County Children’s Services, et al.,
By Marianna Bettman on
“So, what you are asking us to do is send this back so that you can have a jury trial?”
Chief Justice O’Connor, to counsel for Smathers
“So, are you saying an expert can’t render an opinion based on their examination of a file whether or not they believe something was wanton, willful or reckless?”…