Update: On June 23, 2021 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

“If we say 109 (R.C. 109.78(D)) doesn’t apply, then do we allow non-law enforcement personnel to carry a weapon, hoping they do the right thing with it?”

Justice Stewart, to counsel for Madison

Update: On December 21, 2020, the Court dismissed this case as improvidently certified.

“If we agree with you and we sever out subsection (b) in its entirety, doesn’t your client lose?”

Justice Fischer, to counsel for Carlisle

“So, explain to me how this authority given to law enforcement can be exercised to thwart the discretion

Update: On November 12, 2020, the Court dismissed this case because the parties reached a settlement.

“Why didn’t you just argue that attorneys’ fees were barred by the terms of the release?”

Justice DeWine to counsel for Rayco

“If a party has a colorable defense that a contract is even formed in a settlement agreement

Update: On December 18, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“Did the court order him [Chapman] not to have any more children or did the court order him to make reasonable efforts not to have any more children until his child support obligations

Further update:

Pertinent to this remand is the holding in State v. Patrick that a constitutional challenge to a sentence is not barred by R.C. 2953.08(D)(3). So, on March 12, 2021, on remand, the Seventh District first determined on the authority of Patrick that it had jurisdiction to review Kinney’s Eighth Amendment challenge to his

Update: On November 10, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case. Read the analysis here.

“What in your view is perverse, what is it that’s reckless about the actions they (the educators) took—not in terms of reasonableness, but in terms of recklessness?”

Justice French, to counsel for A.R.

Update: On October 20, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“So, what should the judge have said?”

Justice DeWine to counsel for Price

On June 16, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. Mark A. Price

Update: On October 20, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“So, what should the judge have said?”

Justice DeWine to counsel for Price

On June 16, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. Mark A. Price

Update: On November 12, 2020 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“You think that when the average voter went to vote on this amendment 2 or 3 years ago, they thought they were creating rights for municipalities?”

Justice DeWine, to counsel for Centerville

“Does

Update: On November 5, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“Is there no ability for the state to do something different than what the federal government has done?”

Justice French, to counsel for the News Agencies

“Do you have any problem with the