Update: On May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed this case as improvidently accepted.  Read more about that here.

“I’m asking you for a theory, why is UC Physicians, the employer of all the doctors in anesthesiology there, why are they not liable?”

Justice O’Neill, to defense counsel.

On May 3, 2017, the

Update: On May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed this case as improvidently accepted.  Read more about that here.

“I’m asking you for a theory, why is UC Physicians, the employer of all the doctors in anesthesiology there, why are they not liable?”

Justice O’Neill, to defense counsel.

On May 3, 2017, the

Update: On February 7, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On May 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Don Koprivec et al. v. Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County

Update: On February 7, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On May 16, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Don Koprivec et al. v. Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County

Update: On October 26, 2017, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

Read the analysis of the argument here

On May 17, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Orlando Batista, 2016-0903. At issue in the case

Update: On May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed this case as improvidently accepted.  Read more about that here.

Read the analysis of the oral argument here.

On May 3, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case, Anthony Rush and Tammy Rush v. University of Cincinnati Physicians

Update: On September 6, 2017 the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“I’m a former bartender from Athens. So let me just suggest to you that if the alcohol comes off the shelf and goes into the glass, and goes into the mouth of

Update: On January 16, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in this case.  Read the analysis here.

“Our concern isn’t the overriding purpose of the policy, our concern is the overriding purpose of the Constitution…”

Justice French

On April 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in