Whitespace is like air: it is necessary for design to breathe
“What statements were made that would contradict the warranty?”
Justice Brunner, to Counsel for Navistar
“So why should the Court change the bargain that you made into something else?”
Justice DeWine, to Counsel for Dutchmaid
On April 13, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Navistar Inc. v. Dutchmaid Logistics, Inc., 2021-0719…
Read the analysis of the oral argument here.
On April 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Alan Schubert, 2021-0761. At issue in this case is whether police officers may reasonably rely on a search warrant issued for a cell phone despite scant factual evidence linking…
Read the analysis of the oral argument here.
On April 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Alan Schubert, 2021-0761. At issue in this case is whether police officers may reasonably rely on a search warrant issued for a cell phone despite scant factual evidence linking…
On May 17, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio, by a vote of 6-1, dismissed this case as improvidently accepted. Justice DeWine dissented and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
On April 26, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. Austin M. Fuell…
On March 30, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Brandt v. Pompa, 2021-0497. At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts in this sexual assault case. Also at issue is whether R.C. 2315.18…
On April 13, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Navistar Inc. v. Dutchmaid Logistics, Inc., 2021-0719. At issue in this case is whether a contractual disclaimer can thwart a tort claim that is based on the same set of facts and the same amount of damages.
Case Background
Dutchmaid…
On April 13, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Navistar Inc. v. Dutchmaid Logistics, Inc., 2021-0719. At issue in this case is whether a contractual disclaimer can thwart a tort claim that is based on the same set of facts and the same amount of damages.
Case Background
Dutchmaid…
On March 30, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Brandt v. Pompa, 2021-0497. At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts in this sexual assault case. Also at issue is whether R.C.
“What are the facts in your case that support the credentialing aspect of the claim?”
Justice Donnelly, to counsel for the administrator of Walling’s estate
“Are there different criteria for credentialing for employees who are doctors than independent contractors who are doctors?”
Justice Brunner, to counsel for The Toledo Hospital
On March 9, 2022, the…
On March 9, 2022, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Michael Walling, Administrator of the Estate of Raeann Walling, Deceased v. Ransford S. Breyna, M.D., et al, 2021-0241. At issue in this case is whether a party can maintain a negligent credentialing claim against a hospital when the doctor in…
