This case was dismissed as improvidently certified on October 27, 2011.

On October 4, the Ohio Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser et al, 2011-0052. The issue in this case is whether a trial court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve a factual

Update: On October 26 this case was dismissed as improvidently allowed.

On October 4 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State v. Ginley, case # 2010-1925.  This case deals with the troubling issue of victims of domestic violence (the vast majority of whom are women) recanting at trial prior statements to

Update: The merit decision in this case was handed down March 14, 2012. Read the analysis of the decision here.

On October 4 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Paul Jones et al. v. Centex Homes, case # 2010-1826.  The issue acknowledged by both sides to be one of first

Update: On October 16 the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed State v. Ginley, case # 2010-1925 as improvidently allowed. 

 State v. Ginley comes to the Supreme Court after the Eighth District denied the State’s discretionary appeal.  It involves a domestic violence criminal case and the application of Evid. R. 614(A)

A disturbingly common problem

Update: The merit decision in this case was handed down March 14, 2012. Read the analysis of the decision here.

On October 4, 2011, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear arguments in Paul Jones et al. v. Centex Homes #10-1826.  The main issues in this case are whether Ohio recognizes a waiver of

This case was dismissed as improvidentally certified on October 27, 2011.

On Tuesday, October 4, the Ohio Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. Beiser et al, 2011-0052. This case is brought to resolve a conflict between the courts of appeals on the following issue: “When there is a factual

Update: On February 18, 2012 the Supreme Court of Ohio issued a merit decision in this case.  Read that post here.

On September 21 the Ohio Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, case #2010-2148. At issue in the case is the constitutionality of 2315.21(B), the mandatory

Update: the merit decision in this case was handed down February 16, 2012. Read the analysis of that decision here.

On Sept 20 the Ohio Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sampson v.  Cuyahoga  Metropolitan Housing Authority, case #2010-1561.  The issue is whether an employee of the Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority —a political subdivision—could

Update: the merit decision in this case was handed down February 16, 2012. Read the analysis of that decision here.

On Sept 20 the Ohio Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sampson v.  Cuyahoga  Metropolitan Housing Authority, case #2010-1561.  The issue is whether an employee of the Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority —a political subdivision—could

Update: The merit decision in this case was handed down on February 23, 2012.  Read the analysis here. 

On September 20 the high court heard oral argument in Williams v. Ormsby. #10-1946. The issue in the case is whether resumption of a couple’s relationship can be sufficient consideration to support an enforceable contract.  For a