“The good-faith error in misallocating peremptory challenges did not deny Jones the right to a panel of impartial, indifferent jurors, and he had no constitutional right to a panel with jurors who appeared friendly or who were skewed in his favor.”

Justice Kennedy, majority opinion

“This court should not conduct a harmless-error analysis of a

“The good-faith error in misallocating peremptory challenges did not deny Jones the right to a panel of impartial, indifferent jurors, and he had no constitutional right to a panel with jurors who appeared friendly or who were skewed in his favor.”

Justice Kennedy, majority opinion

“This court should not conduct a harmless-error analysis of a

“As we stated in Carnes, a juvenile adjudication is not unreliable for risk-assessment purposes.”

Justice Kennedy, majority opinion

“Buttery is being punished as an adult based on acts he committed as a juvenile. This is fundamentally unfair.”

Justice Donnelly, dissenting opinion

 On May 21, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit

“As we stated in Carnes, a juvenile adjudication is not unreliable for risk-assessment purposes.”

Justice Kennedy, majority opinion

“Buttery is being punished as an adult based on acts he committed as a juvenile. This is fundamentally unfair.”

Justice Donnelly, dissenting opinion

 On May 21, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit

“We consider the language in the policy—which states that the policy could be rendered void ab initio if the insured’s warranty proved to be untrue—to be a sufficient warning.”

Justice Donnelly, opinion of the Court

On May 6, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

“We consider the language in the policy—which states that the policy could be rendered void ab initio if the insured’s warranty proved to be untrue—to be a sufficient warning.”

Justice Donnelly, opinion of the Court

On May 6, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

“There is nothing in the record indicating that Dangler would not have entered his plea had he been more thoroughly informed of the details of the sex-offender-classification scheme… Because Dangler has not established prejudice, he is not entitled to have his no contest plea vacated for a failure to comply with Crim.R. 11(C).”

Justice DeWine

“There is nothing in the record indicating that Dangler would not have entered his plea had he been more thoroughly informed of the details of the sex-offender-classification scheme… Because Dangler has not established prejudice, he is not entitled to have his no contest plea vacated for a failure to comply with Crim.R. 11(C).”

Justice DeWine

“Because the clerk did not journalize the order invoking the adult portion of the SYO sentence until after A.W. turned 21, the juvenile court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over him.”

Justice Stewart, opinion of the Court

On April 16, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re A.W., Slip

“Miller mistakenly equates strict compliance with a requirement that the judge recite the provisions of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) almost verbatim… We have never mandated that a trial court use particular words in order to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c).”

Justice Fischer, opinion of the Court

On April 14, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a