In my last post, I wrote about recusal at the supreme court level. That’s when a justice has to get off a case because of some kind of conflict. In recent times, the reverse of recusal has emerged.  We now have “unrecusal.”

One of the most common reasons a judge has to get off a

In March, the U.S. Supreme Court is going to hear more than five hours of arguments challenging President Obama’s signature Affordable Health Care Act .  There have been rumblings from the right and the left seeking to force Justices Kagan and Thomas to recuse  (remove) themselves from this case, albeit for entirely different reasons.  In

Update: The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in U.S. v. Jones on January 23. Read the analysis of that decision here. 

Both the Ohio Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court are considering the same issue—is the warrantless placement of a GPS on a car and the resulting constant surveillance constitutional. Read the posts

It all began January 18, 2011 at Justice Paul Pfeifer’s swearing-in ceremony for his current (and now last) term.  In his remarks, which he stated might make everyone in the room uncomfortable, he talked about Ohio’s death penalty.  He said that he had concluded  “that it is exceedingly difficult for this statute to be administered